/int/ - International

Pedos are hard at work shitting KC up already >>30354 >>30468 >>30465

I noticed a steady influx of kohlcancer during the last few days. Hope the mods nip it in the bud.

>>30491 indeed mods please ban all 3

you faggots prefer niggers cocks and troon porn to some pedofag posting a girl in a bikini the absolute state of you annoying bitter cucks without your precious cock seriously shut the fuck up every hag lover website is the most vile porn slop hell hole at least pedos keep my faggot little website clean seriously F U C K Y O U >>30491 booohoooohoooo people posted females instead of your precious disgusting super specific fetishes yeah fuck you suck my white COCK

>>30654 damn

>>30654 Fuck off disingenuous pedo. No one is interested in little girls.

>>30654 Bye!

>>30489 Who are you referring to?

Is .rip “gueto”

Don't like pedos. Don't care for pedos. Any sort of pedo dog whistling should be banned immediately before they try to seed this place. Eventually because they are low iq and rather obnoxious, they'll find some other place to fuck with once they realise the door is closed

Is it OK if I 33 but want lay down 18 yo girl?

>>31019 It's okay, if it's legal. That's the bottom line.

>>31051 Remind me, what is the age of consent in Germany?

>>31073 Too old for you, it seems.

>>31073 that old motte-and-bailey trick

>>31073 That deppends on your own age. For older Bernds it's generally 18. If you are underage yourself or are 18-19 there are 14 and 16. Thtats what the pedos always get wrong. The Age of consent of 14 is only for other underage partners. The age of consent of 16 is only for very young legal ones. For all others it's 18. And now pleas stop one and for all this age of consent disucssion. Just have sex with very young looking 18 yo. They do exist.

>>31089 Sorry but my assburgers prevents me from letting this slide >The Age of consent of 14 is only for other underage partners. This is wrong. The difference isn't pinned on age but on mental development/maturity and the 14yo has to be completely voluntary/there can't be financial incentive or strong powerdynamics. IDK how realistic this is but since I'm being just very pedantic about technicalities I have to interject. (I'd be fine with this thread getting nuked though, pedo discussions are over and pedos should get banned) SÄGE for not wanting to escalate this further.

>>31112 You just posted the long and autistic variation of: It's not legal to fuck a 14yo if you are over 18. Just stick to 18+. All other combinations will get you in jail because of autistic wordings. They are only there to get pedos caught. And only pedos try to argue about it. Normal people just accept that it means no 14yo for 18+ and the debate ends. deal with it.

Didn't Germany until the 1990s have a magazine that had a "Ask Dr. Fritz" section or something where a girl 13-15 would mail in a naked picture of herself along with a question for the doctor.

>>31140 If you mean Dr. Sommer "bodychecks" in Bravo magazine, that still exists.

>>31141 I remember it was a mainstream magazine and it showed a full frontal with some frivolous sounding question to the doctor. But I guess all mainstream stuff sounds frivolous to me

>>31145 Yeah that's the bravo magazine and it was more like 16-20 year olds. Nobody had an issue with it because it was seen as sexual education for curious kids. The dad of a friend of mine always bought the magazine and it was so obvious what he was doing with it behind closed doors.

>>31146 >it was so obvious what he was doing with it behind closed doors. Taking studious notes about proper hygiene care! Anyway there's the whole debate about "nudity" vs porn, etc. Context matters a lot.. and cultures are different. USA is very prude about nudity

>>31132 >You just posted the long and autistic variation of: It's not legal to fuck a 14yo if you are over 18 It literally is though. >All other combinations will get you in jail because of autistic wordings. They won't. Some other combinations will, but 18+ with 16-17 is legally completely irrelevant if you're not a teacher/trainer. The chart is right there. >They are only there to get pedos caught. These laws exist to protect children, not to jailbait pedos. >And only pedos try to argue about it. I'm not a pedo, just someone with a law degree who knows better. >Normal people just accept that it means no 14yo for 18+ and the debate ends. Normal people would be surprised that it's legal to have sex with 14yos in Germany >deal with it. You can just accept that you got corrected on a technicality and deal with that but something tells me you will try to call me a pedo just because I like beinc correct.

>>31149 > It literally is though. Only, if you can proof that you are a retard. If I understood that correctly. Not the legal words, but I had it saved as ~([your age] / 2 + 7).

Here, Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_consent

>>31151 > must be married aren't there laws in the US that allow marriage at 12 in some/most states?

>>31152 I was curious and did a lazy AI query and supposedly there are 78 recorded cases of 13 year olds getting married in the US since 2000. 14 recorded cases of 12 year olds. And even a handful of cases of 10 and 11 year olds.

>>31157 Where, in Gypsy communities?

>>31151 So does this make SA better or worse than the rest of Australia?

>>31171 Probably. There used to be a show my sister would watch called, “My Big Fat Gypsy Wedding” on US tv. In one episode a gyp married his 15 yo cousin.